Georgia Murder Suspect Who Removed His Own Eyes Ruled Competent to Stand Trial

A Georgia man accused of a brutal killing has been declared legally competent to stand trial despite shocking acts of self-mutilation while in custody, according to court records.

The ruling allows prosecutors to move forward with murder charges in a case that has drawn widespread attention due to its disturbing details and complex mental health questions.

Court Determines Defendant Is Fit for Trial

The defendant, Robert Brandon Keller, underwent psychological evaluations after he removed both of his own eyes and injured his tongue while being held at the Bulloch County Sheriff’s Office jail.

Medical experts were asked to determine whether Keller understood the legal proceedings against him and whether he was capable of assisting in his own defense.

After reviewing testimony from independent psychologists, the court concluded that Keller is legally competent to stand trial. Evaluators reportedly found that although his actions were extreme, he demonstrated an understanding of the charges and the courtroom process.

Under Georgia law, competency refers specifically to whether a defendant can comprehend the nature of the proceedings and work with an attorney — not whether they were mentally ill at the time of the alleged crime.

Charges in the 2024 Killing

Keller was indicted in connection with the death of Bruce Dupree, whose body was discovered near Interstate 16 in Bulloch County in October 2024.

Prosecutors allege that Dupree suffered multiple stab wounds. A grand jury later charged Keller with several serious offenses, including malice murder, felony murder, armed robbery, aggravated battery, hijacking a motor vehicle, and possession of a weapon during the commission of a felony.

Authorities have not publicly disclosed a motive.

Self-Harm in Custody

While awaiting trial, Keller reportedly committed severe acts of self-harm, including removing both eyes. The incidents prompted immediate medical attention and a formal competency review.

Experts who testified during hearings reportedly stated that Keller did not show clear evidence of a severe psychotic disorder that would prevent him from understanding the legal process. The court ultimately agreed with those findings.

The decision was formalized in an order signed by a Superior Court judge earlier this month.

What Happens Next

With the competency ruling in place, the criminal case can now proceed toward trial. Keller remains in custody without bond.

Legal analysts note that competency rulings can significantly impact the timeline of high-profile criminal cases. While mental health defenses may still be raised during trial, the court’s decision confirms that the defendant can actively participate in his defense.

Legal and Public Reaction

The case has sparked conversations about mental health treatment within correctional facilities and how courts evaluate competency when defendants engage in extreme behavior.

Advocates stress that competency standards are narrowly defined and separate from broader questions about mental illness or criminal responsibility.

As proceedings continue, the focus will shift to evidence presented by both the prosecution and defense regarding the events leading to Dupree’s death.